Imaginary Realities Imaginary Realities About Search Glossary
What's new? Index :)
Select issue:
Join a discussion Resources
     

On the Treatment of Coders
- Sanvean
Applying for Wizardhood
- Selina Kelley
Playing vs Coding
- Arjen Reudink
Starting a Clan
- Shade of Nessalin
The Only Two Guilds on Your Mud
- Caris
Explorers have more fun.
- Lord Ashon
An Introduction to MUSHes
- Ervin Hearn III
Cartoon - The Mud Slinger
- Rebecca Handcock

Letters to the editor

Enter your email to be informed when this site is updated.


Comment on articles

Letter 1
Contact editors

   

On the Treatment of Coders

by Sanvean

One of the sad truths of the mud world is that there are never enough coders. Builders aplenty, brimming with fresh idealism and plans for entire zones, appear (and sometimes disappear) at the drop of a hat. But coders are the unicorns of the mudding world, rarely glimpsed and ardently pursued. We are lucky enough to have three dedicated coders on Armageddon: Morgenes, Tenebrius and Tiernan, as well as a few other staff members willing and able to wade through the bugs file and tinker with things upon occasion. How, then, does an administrator keep these beasts happy? The following four steps may help.
A nice mongolian archer.

Aiming for a target.

1) Communicate: When asking for new code, try to let the coders know exactly what is desired. For example, instead of 'Let's make archery more complicated," a staff member might propose "Let's put a range on archery, so the farther away the target is, the harder it is to shoot it." A full description of the the idea, perhaps including examples, such as fake logs showing what the idea will look like when being used, helps make sure the originator of the idea and the coder are on the same track as far as things like syntax and usage are concerned.

The same holds true for bugs. Describing how it's supposed to work as well to how it's working right now helps clarify ideas. Coders want to know if the bug is REALLY a bug, or something being reported because it doesn't work as the reporter feels it should.

With bugs, give the coders as much information as possible, including how to reproduce the bug. Examples by way of logs are great, and if they include some form of error message (or message that they're getting that shows it's an error), it often allows the coder to track down what section of the code needs to be worked on.

Make sure people aren't bumping into each other. On Armageddon, we've got a coder's board, where people post changes as they make them. This alerts fellow team members to what they're doing and is also helpful if unexpected bugs crop up, enabling people to track exactly what got changed and when. Two people should not be working on the same idea at once unless they know it, and can divvy up the work accordingly.

2) Have a purpose: Will it get used? Is it something players are asking for? This one is a matter of ego, but we're all human and we all do have egos. Seeing their work getting used, regularly and as envisioned, is a reward beyond any thanks or congratulations other staff members can give a coder. Track player requests, through entries in the bugs/ideas/typos files as well as emails to the account and posts on the general discussion board in order to convince a coder that the players want, and will use, something.

Generally, with new ideas figure out how they are moving towards some goal. A piece of code like a new skill is going to sound more interesting if it fits into some overall purpose, such as a master plan of non-combat related skills for the economy than it would if it is just a random idea. You are also going to end up getting more out of the idea if it is part of a greater whole.

Make it innovative. Some coders like to be trail breakers, to feel that they're not just playing catch-up with another mud, but are creating ideas and concepts new to the mud community. Some ideas get requested to 'balance' things out between groups: guilds, or races, or mount speed. When a coder starts to feel like the code they're doing that day only works to nullify a change made last week, then they're going to start wondering what they will be asked to implement tomorrow.

3) Share the work: Do as much of the grunt work as you can for the coders, including helping thoroughly test, providing help files and documentation, and fleshing things out. In testing, give coders information about what is not working and how to recreate the result. Be precise about what needs to be changed: not 'the plague of locusts spell needs to do more damage', but 'it needs to do about twice the damage it is now.' When something requires a new help file or modification of an existing help file, do not expect the coder to do it, but supply it yourself. If it is something that requires building, provide the items. Teamwork of this kind, when it is working well, is terrific, and will often produce amazingly cool results.

4) Appreciate: Good coders can never be praised sufficiently, in my opinion. We try to make sure that players know who is responsible for new and interesting changes, by posting information about them in the news as well as in our weekly update, which is a mailing our players can subscribe to, which provides information about changes, staff and world news, upcoming recommended playing times, etc. When players write in with compliments or feedback on a code change, make sure that the note gets passed along to the person , as well as that the coder knows how cool or slick you think the ideas they have implemented are as well.

There is a tendency sometimes to regard coders as resources that spit out code at request. The fact of the matter is that treating coders in that way will frustrate both sides, leading coders to become discouraged and unmotivated to implement new ideas and builders to feel that their coding needs are not being met. Working on the four areas above may help avoid this sort of frustration.